Standard work often gets a bad reputation because people associate it with paperwork. But the real purpose of standard work is not documentation—it’s reliability. When work is repeatable and outcomes matter, standardization reduces variation and prevents loss.
The key is to standardize the right things, at the right level, with a mechanism to keep standards alive.
Standard work is not a script
In operations, conditions change. Standard work should not pretend everything is predictable. Instead, it defines:
- The best-known method under normal conditions
- The critical checks that prevent failures
- The decision rules for common variations
- The minimum information for safe, effective handoffs
Think of it as “baseline reliability,” not “rigid behavior.”
What to standardize first: use a practical filter
Not everything needs standard work. Prioritize using three questions:
- Is this activity frequent and repeatable?
- Does variation create safety/quality/reliability risk?
- Does failure create significant cost or downtime?
If the answer is yes, it belongs in the first wave.
The “critical few” areas to standardize
To avoid bureaucracy, start with the elements that create the most operational loss:
1) Handoffs
Many incidents and delays happen at boundaries. Standardize what must be communicated at shift handover, between departments, and between planning and execution.
2) Readiness checks
Define what “ready to start” means: tools, permits, access, materials, equipment condition, skill coverage. Readiness prevents stop-start execution.
3) Critical checks and quality points
Where do defects enter? Standardize checks at those points, not everywhere.
4) Decision rules for exceptions
Instead of escalating everything, define decision rules for common exceptions. This speeds response and reduces confusion.
5) Escalation triggers
Standard work is incomplete without triggers: when does a problem become an escalation, and to whom?
Keep standards alive with a feedback loop
The fastest way to kill standard work is to publish it and walk away. Standards need:
- An owner (usually the line leader closest to execution)
- A review cadence (monthly/quarterly depending on change rate)
- A simple method to propose changes
- A way to capture learning from incidents and deviations
Standards should evolve—otherwise people will bypass them.
Make it usable: short, visual, and embedded in routines
Good standard work is:
- Short (one page where possible)
- Visual (checklists, decision trees, photos)
- Used in routines (pre-job, handover, daily control)
- Audited lightly (spot checks that focus on critical steps)
Where INJARO helps
INJARO helps design standard work frameworks that are practical: what to standardize, how to govern changes, and how to connect standards to performance routines. We also make standards automation-ready by defining clear data fields and decision logic—so later digital workflows can be implemented by internal IT or an implementation partner if desired.
Standard work doesn’t have to be bureaucracy. Done right, it’s a reliability system that protects performance from randomness.
Leave a Reply