Firefighting is not a personality problem. It’s a system problem. When plans are weak, roles are unclear, and deviations are detected late, the only way to survive is to react.
Organizations often try to fix firefighting with motivation: “be proactive,” “improve discipline,” “communicate better.” These messages don’t stick because the system still rewards urgency over control.
If you want stability, you need operational control: a predictable way to plan, execute, detect deviations, and respond.
Why firefighting becomes the default
Firefighting is common when:
- The plan is not realistic (constraints are ignored)
- Work is handed over without shared understanding
- Information arrives late or is inconsistent
- Escalation is unclear (“who decides?”)
- Short-term output pressure overrides learning
Over time, people learn that solving problems personally is the fastest way to keep production moving. That creates hero culture—and fragile operations.
Define “stability” in operational terms
Stability is not “no problems.” It’s:
- Fewer surprises
- Smaller deviations
- Faster detection
- Clearer response
- Fewer repeat issues
In stable operations, teams still face issues—but they manage them before they become losses.
The control triangle
A practical way to build stability is to strengthen three elements together:
1) Plan quality
A good plan is not just a target. It accounts for constraints: availability, materials, access, skill, permits, equipment readiness. Plan quality improves when planning includes the people who understand constraints, and when assumptions are made visible.
2) Execution reliability
Execution reliability is the ability to perform to standard. It depends on clear work instructions, role clarity, and readiness checks. The goal is not perfection; it’s consistency.
3) Deviation response
Even with good plans, variance happens. The difference is how fast you detect it and how consistently you respond. Deviation response requires triggers, escalation rules, and disciplined action tracking.
If you only improve one corner of the triangle, firefighting returns.
First 30 days: build routines that create visibility
You can start without major restructuring:
Step 1: Make handover non-negotiable
Handover must include: plan for the next shift, constraints, top risks, and unfinished actions. Use a simple template. The goal is shared mental model.
Step 2: Run a daily control routine
Daily control is not a meeting to “share updates.” It’s a decision routine. Focus on:
- Plan vs actual
- Top 3 losses (time, quality, availability)
- Actions with owners and deadlines
- Escalations needed today
Keep it short and consistent.
Step 3: Install basic triggers
Choose a few triggers that matter: critical downtime threshold, schedule adherence threshold, quality holds threshold. Define what happens when triggered.
Step 4: Track actions visibly
If actions disappear, firefighting returns. Use a simple action tracker with owners, due dates, and status. Don’t let “discussed” become “done.”
Sustainment: standardize and coach
Stability is sustained when leaders coach routines, not just attend them. Coaching includes:
- Asking for facts before opinions
- Checking that triggers lead to actions
- Ensuring escalation rules are followed
- Helping teams remove recurring constraints
- Standardizing improvements that work
Over time, firefighting reduces because repeat issues are addressed systematically.
Where INJARO helps
INJARO supports the design of operational control systems: routines, governance, decision logic, escalation paths, and KPI triggers. We make it automation-ready by defining workflows and reporting requirements clearly—so digital tools can be implemented later by internal IT or an implementation partner if desired.
Firefighting feels normal until stability shows you what’s possible. Control is not bureaucracy—it’s freedom from constant emergency mode.
Leave a Reply